A Question of Death (Quincy, M.E.)

A Question of Death
Series Quincy, M.E. Season 3 Episode 10 Airdate January 4, 1979 Airtime Runtime approx. 47 minutes Production No. 51022 Writer Aubrey Solomon & Steve Greenberg (story & teleplay); Peter J. Thompson & Robert Crais (story) Director Ray Danton Music by Guest Star(s) Royal Dano as hospital administrator; parent and lawyer characters Victim young motorcyclist (brain‐dead donor) Autopsy Findings brain death confirmed; legal declaration of death before organ harvest Network NBC Production Company Glen A. Larson Productions / Universal Television Previous Episode A Night to Raise the Dead (Quincy, M.E.) Next Episode House of No Return (Quincy, M.E.) Previous Season Next Season

Title card for “A Question of Death”

Title card for “A Question of Death”

Episode Quote

"Brain death is a legal definition. It isn't hopeful thinking—it's science, Sam. And if we don't accept it, people will die because of indecision." ~ Dr. Quincy

Episode Overview

A Question of Death (Season 3, Episode 10) aired on NBC on **January 4, 1979**. Quincy assists with a hospital’s organ donation program when a young man is declared brain dead after a motorcycle accident. A wealthy transplant recipient receives the kidney, but the donor’s family is later convinced to sue, alleging improper haste and coercion. Quincy must use scientific evidence to uphold the legal declaration of death and protect public trust in organ donation programs. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

Application of The QME Episode Laws

Following all four **QME Episode Laws**:

✅ **Law 1 – Seek truth and bring justice:** Quincy defends the declaration of brain death and ensures the donor’s family understands the medical evidence, preserving the integrity of the organ program. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

✅ **Law 2 – Explore social and ethical issues:** The episode tackles the legal, moral, and financial implications of organ donation, medical decision‑making, and healthcare inequality. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

✅ **Law 3 – Address controversial topics sensitively:** Balancing grief, legal threats, and the ambiguity of brain death, the narrative handles emotional complexity with respect. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

✅ **Law 4 – Forensic accuracy:** Quincy relies on medical and neurological evidence to determine timing and definition of death, ensuring legal clarity and scientific precision. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

Episode Synopsis

After a motorcycle crash, a young man is declared brain-dead and his family consents to organ donation. Quincy examines the autopsy and confirms brain death, facilitating a transplant to a dialysis patient. When a lawyer convinces the family to sue the hospital for alleged premature death declaration and favoritism toward the wealthy recipient, Quincy must prove that the death certificate and transplant procedure were scientifically grounded and ethically handled.

Case File Summary

Victim: Young male motorcycle accident victim, certified brain-dead. Recipient Controversy: Kidney allocated to wealthy man; others in greater medical need overlooked. Case #: QME 3.10 / 51022

The controversy centers not on foul play, but procedural integrity, timing of brain death certification, and equitable organ allocation.

Alleged Perpetrator(s) & Additional Victims

• Additional victims: Donor's grieving family; patients on dialysis awaiting transplants.
• Alleged perpetrator(s): Hospital administration and transplant coordinator accused of priority misallocation; no criminal intent established.

Forensic Science Insight

• Expert distinction between brain death and cardiac death.
• Use of electroencephalogram (EEG) and neurological standards to support medical declaration.
• Addresses the hands-on role of medical examiners in validating death — not just diagnosing but protecting the system’s legitimacy. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}

Themes & Tropes

• **Defining Death** – medical, legal, and ethical standards collide in practice.
• **Organ Donation Ethics** – exploring access, need, and influence in transplant allocation.
• **Science vs. Litigation** – expert testimony counteracts sensational legal claims.
• **Quincy as Advocate** – upholding evidence-based medicine in the face of emotional controversy.

Reception & Ratings

The episode is rated **7.6/10** on IMDb from over 10,000 votes. Reviews describe it as a timely and thought-provoking but occasionally overly didactic installment. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}

Fan discussion often highlights this as one of the episodes where Quincy serves more as a medical ethicist than detective—earning both praise and criticism for its didactic tone. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}

Trivia

• Quincy advocates for mandatory helmet laws, anticipating later California legislation requiring motorcycle helmets by over a decade. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
• Director Ray Danton and writers Solomon & Greenberg crafted stories emphasizing science-informed medical policy.

Cultural Impact

"A Question of Death" prominently centers organ donation ethics and brain-death definitions at a time when public understanding was evolving. Known for influencing later public and legislative discourse on end‑of‑life medical decisions.

See Also

• A Night to Raise the Dead (Quincy, M.E.)
• House of No Return (Quincy, M.E.)
• List of Quincy, M.E. episodes
• QME Ep Laws
• Organ donation
• Brain death
• Medical ethics
• Forensic pathology

External Links

• IMDb: "A Question of Death"
• TheTVDB: A Question of Death
• The QME Episode Laws @ Quincy Examiner